Operational product
KeneaFactu
Invoicing connected to your business.
Every invoice, with clear follow-up.
- Input
- Review
- Follow-up
Projects / Kenea pipeline
From an idea.
To a working system.
An operational product, a Microsoft 365 practice and six active projects. Explore the purpose and current stage of each.
Explore the pipelineSpecialist service
KeneaPoint
SharePoint and Microsoft 365, organised around your team.
Documents and permissions for working together.
- Documents
- Permissions
- Team
Active project pipeline
Six projects. A clear direction.
Currently in definition and design. Each project addresses a different process. The technology shown is an architecture option, selected to fit each engagement.
- 01Define
- 02Build
- 03Validate
- 04Operate
Industrial documentation
KeneaTrace
From each requirement to its evidence.
- Requirement
- Document
- Review
Every requirement, with its evidence.
We connect requirements, documents and versions to identify gaps or inconsistencies in a technical delivery.
Definition and design 01 / 04
Architecture options
Explore this project
The context
A delivery may bring together certificates, drawings and revisions from several suppliers. Checking completeness means linking each document to the correct equipment, order and version.
Validation criteria
Whether the problem recurs across businesses, whether authorised samples are available and whether it adds value beyond the existing document management system. A delivery's technical conformity remains subject to professional review.
Next milestone
One equipment family and its documentation, reviewed in parallel by a person and the prototype. Compare review time, significant gaps detected, omissions and unnecessary alerts before extending the scope.
Quotations and requirements
KeneaScope
Understand what changes between versions.
- Version A
- Change
- Version B
Understand what changes.
We organise requirements, questions and owners to prepare a technical response and review its changes.
Definition and design 01 / 04
Architecture options
Explore this project
The context
A request for quotation can change across emails, attachments and revisions. A requirement that fails to reach the right person may later turn into a late clarification or unplanned work.
Validation criteria
The ability to distinguish a requirement from a reference, contradiction or option. Also the effort needed to prepare the documents and verify the matrix compared with manual review.
Next milestone
A set of completed requests for quotation, with authorised access to their versions and conclusions. Measure omitted requirements, correctly linked changes and time to produce a matrix ready for review.
Process coordination
KeneaFlow
A next action with a clear owner.
- Exception
- Owner
- Next step
Make the next action clear.
We bring process exceptions together to define who should resolve them, with what information and by when.
Definition and design 01 / 04
Architecture options
Explore this project
The context
A blocked order, missing approval or partial delivery can be scattered across email, ERP and spreadsheets. The difficulty comes when no tool makes it clear who should resolve the exception.
Validation criteria
Which states can be interpreted reliably, who can change them and whether configuring the current software would be enough. The useful difference would have to be resolving exceptions across tools.
Next milestone
One order-to-delivery workflow with a defined set of exceptions. Compare blocked time, handoffs without an owner and coordination effort, including the work needed to maintain the inbox.
Verifiable integrations
KeneaBridge
Check the connection before it goes live.
- Source
- Test
- Destination
Test before connecting.
We design system exchange tests to identify changes in data and business rules before operation.
Definition and design 01 / 04
Architecture options
Explore this project
The context
A connection can keep responding while interpreting a status, unit or identifier incorrectly after an update. Finding that difference in a test environment can prevent it appearing in a real order.
Validation criteria
Access to test environments, representative examples and the ability to remove sensitive data. We would need to show which failures it detects beyond tests already supplied by the vendor or integrator.
Next milestone
One integration, two versions and a catalogue of known failures in an isolated environment. Measure detected regressions, false alerts and the time required to check an update. Tests would not write to production systems.
Knowledge with sources
KeneaAssist
An answer that keeps its sources.
- Question
- Sources
- Answer
Answers you can review.
We work on queries over authorised documentation, with visible sources and review when information is insufficient.
Definition and design 01 / 04
Architecture options
Explore this project
The context
The answer to an incident may be in a procedure, manual or previous resolution. Finding it is not enough if the document has changed or the person asking lacks permission to read it.
Validation criteria
Answer quality, respect for permissions and the cost of keeping knowledge current. It would be compared with existing search and available assistants. It is not proposed as an autonomous equipment operator.
Next milestone
One area of internal support and a set of questions with reviewed answers. Measure correct answers supported by sources, incorrect answers, appropriate abstentions and resolution time, including human review.
Operational insight
KeneaSignal
See where the process is waiting.
- Events
- Waiting
- Intervention
See where work waits.
We connect process events to locate delays and decide where an intervention is worthwhile.
Definition and design 01 / 04
Architecture options
Explore this project
The context
Process timings are spread across applications. Without reconstructing the whole workflow, it is easy to automate a quick task while work still waits for days somewhere else.
Validation criteria
Whether the records can reconstruct the process and whether the analysis is useful with limited data. Simulations would state their assumptions. They would not offer guaranteed predictions or rank individual employees' performance.
Next milestone
One process with verifiable dates and states, compared with the team's observations. Measure workflow coverage, confirmed waiting time and the effect of an agreed improvement, accounting for changes in volume and type of work.
In context / Microsoft
See the tools at work.
Two Microsoft demonstrations showing how content, automation and AI connect. Videos in English.
Official demo / 4:15Copilot Studio and SharePoint
How an agent uses SharePoint content to answer scoped questions and work with information from the organisation.
Official demo / 11:49Automation in SharePoint
A walkthrough of document workflows, notifications and approvals in SharePoint. A reference for recognising tasks that can work together.
Selecting “Allow and play” loads external YouTube content and connects your browser to Google. Permission applies only to that video and is not saved. The demos are by Microsoft; the architectural covers are by Kenea. Feature availability depends on your environment and licences. Official source ↗
Does one of these
problems sound familiar?
Tell us about the workflow and where it gets difficult. The first conversation will help decide whether an assessment is worthwhile. Any paid work is agreed in advance.